Review and Assessment at the Beginning of the Music Year

When a new school year starts, many teachers want to begin making music right away, and actively exploring musical concepts from last year and moving toward new musical understandings.

When we start the school year, where might we begin musically? How will we know what students remember from last year? How will we keep music class active, while reviewing previously learned concepts?

Let’s look at a few ways to review and assess at the beginning of the year. We’ll clarify what assessment is (and isn’t) in this context, we’ll talk about choosing what to assess, the assessment process, and documentation options.

Let’s jump in!

 
 

Assessments, Grades, & Documentation

Many of us come to conversations about assessment with some baggage from undergraduate or graduate degree programs or administration.

When I discuss these terms, here are my definitions:

  • Assessments: How we know what students need from us next

  • Grades: Markings meant to show achievement

  • Documentation: Preserving data through video, audio, or written text

For the purposes of this conversation, we probably don’t care about grades. We do care about assessments because that’s the mechanism we’ll use to plan the next class. The assessments might be documented a number of ways, depending on what works best for each unique teaching situation.

Ensemble Context

It’s also helpful to point out that not all assessments need to be individual. In fact, most of us care about how our students perform in an ensemble setting more than an individual solo setting. The assessment context we’re talking about today is within an ensemble.

Assessing What We Care About 

For many of us, we don’t actually care if students have memorized a symbol and assigned it a Standard Western Notation name. 

What’s actually more valuable is how students embody and interact with the musical material. 

Since that’s what we care about more than rote memorization, that’s where we’ll start the assessment process.

The Review & Assessment Process: Do, Describe, Label, Use

This review and assessment process moves from singing and playing games (do), to noticing the musical characteristics of the material (describe), to aligning vocabulary to discuss the musical element (label), and to extending our use of the element in a creative way (use).

There are examples of the individual steps below. However, in the classroom, these steps might not happen in a neat, isolated way. For some groups we might condense the process as a whole, shortening each activity so it takes place in a single lesson. For other groups it will be more appropriate to extend the activities through several weeks, depending on how much review students need.

The data we gather from students during the activities will inform pacing.

These review experiences will likely be the core activities in the first weeks of school, but they certainly won’t be the only activities. We’ll combine them with other songs, games, and activities that move us toward future learning.

 

 

Do: Making Music

The first step of our process is to actually do the skill we’re assessing!

This is the fun part, and this is actually the core assessment step. Everything else we do comes from these experiences. 

Here are a few examples:

Example 1: Catchy Song

This is the circle game from last year’s 3rd Grade concept plan for taka-di inside The Planning Binder, and part of the review process for 4th and 5th grade this year.

The form of the song is Chorus, Verse 1, Chorus, Verse 2, Chorus.

The movements for the chorus and the verses stay the same throughout the song. (Note: it can be helpful to slow the playback speed when introducing the song.)

Assessment Question: Do students play the rhythm accurately in the game?


Example 2: Plainsies Clapsies  

Students love this game! This is part of the 2nd Grade Melody Review concept plan.

Consider using a scarf, cotton ball, napkin, or tissue. When students are ready, they can advance to using a bean bag or a small ball.

 
 
  • Sing and play game

  • Sing on a neutral syllable and use your scarf to show the melodic contour

Assessment Questions: Do students match pitch in the game? Do they show the melodic contour accurately?


Example 3: Tortillitas para Mamá 

This popular rhyme is well-known and well-loved in many places! We’re using this inside the 1st grade Steady Beat Review concept plan inside The Planning Binder.

 
 
  • Speak the rhyme and pat tortillitas.

  • Replace “mama” and “papa” with students’ names

  • What will we put inside the tortilliats when they’re done? Students suggest foods between rounds of the rhyme.

Assessment Question: Do students pat a consistent and accurate steady beat in time with the rhyme?

 

 

What Materials to Use 

Because we’re using this as a baseline assessment, we want to be sure students are familiar with the song. This helps ensure the validity and reliability of the assessment results. 

With validity and reliability as a consideration, we’ll probably want to start our musicing with songs students already know and enjoy. Consider singing and playing games from last year as review, then adding in new repertoire.

Assessment that Feels like Play 

This is the part of the process that feels like play. At this point in the assessment process, we’re mainly working on remembering what it’s like to be in the music class and interact with each other. 

Assessment questions: 

At this point in the assessment process, we’re primarily interested in how students actualize the musical material. That is, how they music. These assessment questions have a lot to do with the accuracy of the performance.

Do students match pitch? Do students sing the target element in the context of the repertoire? Do students keep a steady beat? Do students play body percussion to the rhythm of the song? 

This information sets us up well to move on to the next step of the process.


Describe: Noticing Music

In the next class, the same class, or several classes later, students might be ready to notice the musical features of the song material. 

With the target element in an extracted phrase, students can notice its characteristics. Is it high or low? How many times do they hear the high note? Is the rhythm from the extracted phrase long or short? Where is the longest word? What’s the form of the song?

Example 1: Catchy Song

  • Play the circle game.

  • Notice that the rhythmic form is aaab (same same same different).

  • Speak and point to steady beat strips on the board.

  • With a partner, students figure out where each of the words go over the steady beat strips as the teacher walks around the room.

  • Notice a “short short long” pattern on the second beat.

  • As a class, transfer text notation to graphic notation.

Assessment Questions: In their partner conversations, do students accurately identify the text placement of the words? Are there any points of friction in the process of moving from playing the rhythm, to moving text, to showing graphic notation? How much teacher input does the process take?

Example 2: Plainsies Clapsies  

  • Play the game.

  • Isolate the phrase, “right hand, left hand” and aurally identify sol and mi in “left hand”

  • What do you notice about the “right hand” part? Is it the same melody or different? (different)

  • Sing the same phrase with sol and mi in the last two beats (“right hand, sol mi”)

  • Sing the phrase again. Students throw their scarf on the highest pitch they hear.

  • Aurally identify that “hand” is the high pitch and that it’s higher than sol.

Assessment Questions: Do students aurally identify the descending minor third pattern as “sol mi”? Do they aurally identify the highest word in the phrase? Do they identify that it’s higher than sol? How much teacher input does the process take?

Example 3: Tortillitas para Mamá 

  • Speak the rhyme and pat the tortillitas

  • As we pat these tortillitas, do our hands stay steady or unsteady? Let’s check. (steady)

  • Do they stay steady the whole time? Let’s check. (the whole time)

Assessment Question: Do students identify that the motions of the rhyme stay steady?

 

 

Assessment Questions:

These assessment questions are geared toward seeing what students notice about the new element. In this stage of the process, we’re interested in how students aurally zoom in on the musical characteristics of the material. Is the element we’re discussing long or short? Even or uneven? High or low? How much higher? How much lower?

The Review and Assessment Process:

This part of the process will have many variables! It’s entirely possible that in a single lesson, this step of noticing and describing an element will blend directly into the labeling step. This will depend on how familiar students are with the material and aural identification process from last year. If students are ready to move ahead, great! If not, we can stay in this step as long as we need.


Label: Assigning Vocabulary

After students have sung songs and played games, and after they’ve articulated what they notice about the music, we might be ready to move on to labeling.

When we label an element, we assign it a common classroom vocabulary.

Real musicians call these elements many things and write them many different ways! Sometimes real musicians don’t label these elements at all, and they don’t write them down. They just use them to make music.

Because real musicians can use so many different terms to describe music, it can be helpful to have a common classroom vocabulary so we can communicate visually and aurally more effectively.

 

 

Example 1: Catchy Song:

  • Review ta-di and taka-di. Compare those rhythms to other previously learned rhythmic elements, like ta, takadimi, and ta-dimi.

 

Example 2: Plainsies Clapsies:

  • Review the hand signs for sol, la, and mi. Review where these pitches live on the staff.

 

Example 3: Tortillitas para Mama:

  • Review the term, “beat.” Practice tracking beat icons of tortillas on the board.

 

 

Students as Teachers

This is a beautiful time for students to be the teacher! 

Sometimes this happens seamlessly in the moment - one student remembers and can share the information with the class, or several students remember and talk to each other.

Other times it might need a bit more structuring.

Facilitating Students as Teachers 

There are many different ways we might approach asking students to teach the class! Here’s a process to consider if you’re looking for a way to facilitate student-led review.

  • Turn and Talk: Students turn to a partner and work together to describe the element and recall the vocabulary we use in this class. 

    • As they talk, encourage students to think about how they would describe the element (higher than, lower than, longer than, shorter than, etc.), how they would show the element (either with a hand sign or something written), and what we call the element (either descriptive vocabulary or classroom vocabulary)

  • Partner Pair: Pairs of students join with another group, creating a group of four. In the group of four, students combine their information. Some students will recall things that others won’t! It can be helpful to join pieces of the musical puzzle together through small group work.

  • Share Out: One “spokesperson” from each group shares their group’s thoughts about how to describe, show, and label the element.

  • Check: Students have already come up with the important information about the element. The only missing piece might be what we call the element in this class. This is the time for the teacher to circle in and fill in any gaps, or decide to wait until next class to discuss.

This is also a great structure to consider for classes with combined grades, or new students who came from other programs.

In this process, students might recall the name, sign, or symbol of a new element, but perhaps not all three. In this case, remember that they’ve already done the most important work on their own by using the element musically and analyzing it critically.


Use: Creating Music

After we’ve had an active music experience, after we’ve described the characteristics of the target element, and after we have a common vocabulary for the element, we’re probably ready to start using it consciously in a creative way.

Students can certainly use the target element creatively without establishing a common vocabulary for it! Real musicians do this all the time. However, having a common vocabulary (such as “la” “takadimi” “half note”), and a common way to notate the element can help us communicate with each other more efficiently during the creative process.

Example 1: Catchy Song

  • Play the circle game.

  • Students sit.

  • Play the song again. During the verses, instead of walking around the circle, the teacher pats an improvised eight-beat rhythm pattern. Students improvise a rhythm response back. Continue improvising through the verses, then play the rhythm of the chorus like normal.

  • After the activity, students choose their favorite rhythm improvisation response and figure out how to speak it on rhythm syllables.

Assessment Questions: When they play their rhythm response, do you notice students improvising or imitating your pattern? Do you notice a variety of rhythms being used? Do students easily identify the rhythmic syllables of their rhythm? How much teacher assistance does this process take?

Example 2: Plainsies Clapsies  

  • Play the game.

  • Sing the song on solfege while pointing to stairsteps and a barred instrument.

  • With a partner, students figure out how to play the first eight beats of the song by ear.

  • With a partner, students mix up the pitches to create a new version of the song. Students practice and then share out as time allows.

Assessment Questions: Do students identify where sol la mi are on the barred instrument in this context? Do they play the first eight beats accurately? And when they mix up the pitches to create their new song, are they still using sol la mi? How much teacher assistance does this whole process take?

Example 3: Tortillitas para Mamá 

  • Speak the rhyme and pat the tortillitas.

  • Students help the teacher arrange the beat motions for each line of the rhyme using clap, pat, and stamp

    • Example:

    • Clap clap clap clap | stamp stamp stamp stamp | clap clap clap clap | stamp stamp stamp stamp

    • Pat pat pat pat | clap clap clap clap | pat pat pat pat | stamp stamp stamp stamp

Assessment Question: Do you notice that students have flexibility in how they keep the steady beat? Are some combinations of body percussion easier than others?


Assessment Documentation 

You’ll notice that these assessment questions lend themselves to qualitative - not quantitative - data collection.

My opinion is that for many teaching situations, qualitative data are more useful at the beginning of the year when we just want to get a sense of where the class is musically.

That said, these assessment questions can easily be formulated into rubrics or other quantitative measurement systems.

If you choose to collect qualitative data, you might consider using a document like this:

 
 

Next Steps

Now that students have reviewed known musical elements in known material, a great next step is to see if they can transfer their understanding to new, unknown material.

Bringing in new songs, games, and activities, do students apply the same critical thinking process to identify known concepts in unknown material?


Students are active learners, so it makes sense that our assessment and review process should be active as well!

This is an approach that starts the year musically, while looking for evidence of learning that will inform the pacing of the next steps.

Throughout the process, we’re looking at how students embody and interact with the musical material. This sets us up well to continue actively musicing in community.

 
 

Assessing Improvisation in Elementary General Music

For many music educators, improvisation can feel difficult to assess. Many of us view improvisation as a personal expression of musical ideas. We may think of it as subjective, instead of as a concrete “right or wrong” task.

In many ways, these views are accurate! Improvisation is a divergent activity, meaning there are multiple possible correct answers.  It also necessitates personal musical choice, which can be subjective. These characteristics of improvisation are accurate, but that doesn’t necessarily take away from assessment validity. When we frame assessment as how we know what students need from us, clarify our goals with long-range planning, and collect data in a play-based way, we’re set up well to assess improvisation.

Let’s look at some specific ways to assess improvisation in an elementary general music setting.  

We’ll start with the activities themselves, and then discuss principles to keep in mind when it’s time to improvise with student musicians.

You can find more detail about assessment for elementary general music in the assessment course.


 
How to Assess Improvisation in Elementary General Music
 

Improvisation Assessment Examples: 

Improvising a Loud and Quiet:¿Quién Es Esa Gente?

 

Sourced from Vamos a Cantar: 230 Latino and Hispanic Folk Songs to Sing, Read, and Play

 

In this example, Kindergarten students sing a loud or quiet improvisation, depending on the musical situation they’re describing.

Clarifying Goals through Long-Range Planning:

Loud and quiet is an early comparative Kindergarten students explore. Throughout the concept plan students make musical choices, and at the end of this concept plan from The Planning Binder in the 2020 - 2021 school year, students improvise a story with a loud or quiet voice.

Because the purpose of this assessment is loud and quiet, we’re not concerned with a specific toneset students should use, or the length of the improvisation. We’re only assessing their appropriate use of a loud and quiet singing voice improvisation.

Assessment Logistics:

  • Song: ¿Quién Es Esa Gente?

  • Objective: Students improvise with a loud or quiet singing voice

  • Assessment Activity: Students improvise with a loud or quiet singing voice

  • Data Collection: The teacher listens to students improvise with a loud or quiet singing voice to the class and with a partner.

  • Measurement Tool: Rubric with a description of the improvisation:

Loud and Quiet Singing Assessment Rubric_1.jpg
  • The student improvises with a loud or quiet singing voice

  • The student does not improvise with a loud or quiet singing voice, or does not improvise

  • Lesson Segment Time: 3 minutes

The Assessment Process:

  1. Sing the song and pat the steady beat.

  2. The teacher sings the questions: When is it a good time to use a quiet voice? When is it a good idea to use a loud voice? Please think your answer in your head, then get ready to sing it.

  3. Students brainstorm ideas, then share their answers with a loud or a quiet improvised melody.

  4. Examples:

    • “It’s a good idea to use a loud voice on the playground”

    • “It’s a good idea to use a loud voice at a birthday party”

    • “It’s a good idea to use a quiet voice in the library”

    • “It’s a good idea to use a quiet voice when my little brother is sleeping”

  5. In between each sharing, students sing the song with a loud or quiet singing voice and motions to show loud and quiet.

  6. Students turn to a partner and take turns sharing their ideas with a loud or quiet singing voice.

Data Interpretation:

We might look at the data and decide we’re ready to move onto the next musical concept! We might also look at the data and decide students would benefit from more practice with a loud and quiet singing voice. This part of the process is typically an intuitive understanding on the part of the teacher. As we collect the data (listen to students improvise) we normally have a clear sense of how to interpret the assessment results and how to adapt our next steps. We just might not always recognize that our intuitive redirection of the next activity is based on data analysis.


Improvising with Rhythmic Fluidity: Ickle Ockle

Sourced from Kodaly.hnu.edu

Game: Students walk in a circle holding hands and singing the song. At the end of the song, students find a partner (the partner may be anyone in the circle besides their immediate neighbor). Any student without a partner goes to the middle and the game begins again.

Clarifying Goals through Long-Range Planning

In this improvisation example, students improvise eight beats as a class and with a partner.

One of the characteristics of musical fluency is that students’ improvisations use a fluid, natural flow of music, without stopping and starting or disrupting the steady underlying pulse. Because the goal in this activity is rhythmic fluidity, it isn’t necessary for students to use a specific set of rhythms, or use part of their partner’s question material in their own improvisation answer. Any output with smooth pacing is an accomplishment of the goal.

Assessment Logistics

  • Song: Ickle Ockle

  • Objective: Students improvise eight beats with rhythmic fluency

  • Assessment activity: With a partner, students improvise eight beats with rhythmic fluency

  • Data collection: The teacher listens and watches students improvise with rhythmic fluency as a class and with a partner. Because the game is repeated more than once, the teacher has the opportunity to listen to multiple students in different parts of the classroom, paired with different improvisation partners.

Rhythm Improvisaiton Rubric_1_1.jpg
  • Measurement Tool: Rubric with a description of the improvisation:

    • The student improvises with complete rhythmic fluency throughout the entire performance

    • The student improvises fluently throughout the majority of the improvisation. Some articulations may occur slightly behind or ahead of the steady beat.

    • The student improvises with inconsistent rhythmic fluency

    • The student does not improvise

  • Lesson Segment Length: 6 minutes

  • Previous Knowledge and Experience: Before this activity, students would have plenty of experience singing and playing the game to Ickle Ockle. They would also have cognitive knowledge of and diverse experiences (including improvisation) with the rhythms used in the song: ta, ta-di, and ta rest.

The Assessment Process:

  1. Sing and play the game to Ickle Ockle as normal.

  2. In the next round of the game, the teacher claps an improvised eight-beat rhythm. Students improvise their own eight-beat response back.

  3. The teacher demonstrates sample improvisations with fluency (a consistent steady pulse underlying the improvisation) and without fluency (an inconsistent steady pulse underlying the improvisation). Students identify the use of a “smooth” or “jerky” steady beat in each example.

  4. Sing and play the game again with the teacher improvising the rhythmic question and students improvising the rhythmic answer.

  5. After a few rounds, and when the teacher observes that students are ready, students improvise both the question and the answer:

    • Sing the song and play the game. When students find their partner, one claps an eight-beat question and the other claps an eight-beat improvised answer.

Data Interpretation

When we look at the data from the activity, we might decide we should go back and practice improvisation in other structures before asking students to improvise in pairs. We might also decide students should repeat the activity in the next class, but perform their improvisations as solos. Depending on our pedagogical goals, we could also determine that students are ready to move from clapping their improvisations to playing them on barred instruments in question and answer form. The way we interpret and apply the data will go back to our long-range plans for student learning.


Improvising with Takadimi: Old Brass Wagon

Source: Hamilton, G. M. (1914). The Play-Party in Northeast Missouri. The Journal of American Folklore,

27(105), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/534622

Clarifying Goals through Long-Range Planning

In this improvisation activity, students are asked to use a specific rhythm in their improvisation. In this specific case, the inclusion of takadimi is the only quantitative measurement of the improvisation we need. We might notice other important elements of the student’s improvisation, such as their level of rhythmic “flow” (fluency) or the length of the improvisation. We might even document those observations so we can alter the next class activities. However, those performance data would not factor in to the assessment evaluation for this specific improvisation experience. In this case, we are only assessing students’ use of the rhythmic element, takadimi.

Assessment Logistics

  • Song: Old Brass Wagon

  • Objective: Students improvise with takadimi

  • Assessment Activity: Students improvise with takadimi

  • Data Collection: The teacher listens to students improvise with takadimi, and students self-assess their improvisation

  • Measurement Tool: Rubric with a description of the improvisation:

    • The student uses takadimi in their improvisation

    • The student does not use takadimi in their improvisation, or does not improvise

Takadimi Improvisation_1.jpg
  • Lesson Segment Time: 10 minutes

  • Previous Knowledge and Experience: Before this activity, students would have plenty of experience singing and playing the game to Old Brass Wagon. They would also have cognitive knowledge of and diverse experiences with the rhythms used in the first three phrases of the song: ta, ta-di, and takadimi.

The Assessment Process:

  1. Students sing and play the game to Old Brass Wagon.

  2. Show the notation of the song on the board with different song endings. (These endings might be some the teacher provides ahead of time, or students might suggest them as a part of the lesson process.)

  3. Seated, students play the rhythms on the board with their choice of body percussion. Try out the first three notated endings.

  4. Notice that the fourth ending is empty! Tell students this box is empty so they may make up their own rhythms instead of reading what the board says to do.

  5. Students choose their favorite ending (including improvisation), hold up their fingers to show their choice, and tell someone next to them which one they’ll choose to play.

  6. Pat and clap the rhythm of the song again. Students play their chosen ending.

  7. This time, let’s stand up and everyone will improvise their own rhythmic ending. We’ll do this two times. The first time, you’ll improvise whatever you want! The second time, you’ll do your best to include “takadimi” in your response.

  8. Students turn to a partner and explain the directions (the first time, just improvise. The second time, improvise using takadimi).

  9. Pat and clap the rhythm of the song two times.

  10. Nice! Did you include takadimi in your improvisation? Students show a thumbs up / thumbs down, or sign language for yes or no.

Data Interpretation

This activity gives students many opportunities for musical choice. In the convergent part of the process when students read the notation, they choose the body percussion they’ll use. When it’s time to improvise, they’ve had multiple examples of endings that use takadimi. They also have the opportunity to try out their improvisation before consciously trying to use takadimi in the ending. When we observe these many scaffolds of musical choice, improvisation, and conscious musical knowledge, we’re gathering important data that we can use in future instruction.

Each step in the process gives us important data about how students are handling varied opportunities for musical choice. When we look at the data for the improvisation assessment, we might decide we’re ready for longer improvisation activities, like eight or sixteen beats. We might also use qualitative data to observe that students struggle to read the rhythmic notation on the board accurately. In that case, we might review aural skills and visual notation of takadimi in the next lesson.

Adapting Prior to Notation

If students do not yet have conscious knowledge of takadimi, the activity can be adapted with text and graphic notation instead of Standard Western notation. Use the words, circle to the, wagon, and left.


We’ve looked at three examples of assessing student improvisations.

Let’s zoom out and discuss principles to keep in mind when it’s time to assess improvisation in elementary general music.

  • We’ll start with looking at what exactly improvisation and assessment are.

  • We’ll also talk about the types of data we can use to assess improvisation.

  • Last, we’ll look at the role of long-range planning in the improvisation assessment process.

Defining Improvisation and Assessment 

Sometimes the reason we feel confused about how to assess improvisation is that we lack clarity in what improvisation is, and what assessment is. 

Improvisation:

When students make a musical choice and perform it spontaneously, they are improvising. This spontaneous musical choice might be as simple as making up new motions on the spot to go with a song or as complex as improvising over a 12-bar blues progression.

The simultaneous imagination and production of a sound is key in setting improvisation apart from other musical processes. In contrast, creative tasks like arranging and composition involve space between the time it takes to have a musical thought and the time it takes to execute a musical thought. Improvisations are also complete works in and of themselves. The creator doesn’t intend to go back and edit them later, as is the case with composition and arranging. Improvisations exist in the moment they are produced.

Assessment:

Assessments are how we know what students need from us next. Assessments are collaborative and intentional musical experiences where we design a learning experience and get feedback from students so we can craft the next learning experience.

Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment Data for Improvisation

Assessment data might take the form of numbers and letters to be used as grades, numbers and letters that aren’t used as grades, or qualitative observations like sticky notes.

These data can be divided into two categories:

  • Qualitative: Data that narrate or describe characteristics

  • Quantitative: Data that show quick summarizations with an absolute value (like numbers or letter grades)

Both of these forms have their pros and cons, and both forms of data can be useful to us in different ways.

When we assess improvisation we may choose to document quantitative data with a quick numerical score, but make a note to ourselves using qualitative data so we get more background information about the student performance.

Assessing Improvisation: Clarify Goals through Long-Range Planning

Assessment of improvisation is directly tied to long-range planning because the assessment is directly tied to the purpose of the activity.

The assessment practice we choose will be dependent upon our goals for the improvisation itself. These goals are directed by the larger curriculum planning process for our program as a whole.

When we craft our value statement for our program at the beginning of the curriculum planning process, we might include values-based ideas such as wanting to develop musical thinkers who can actualize their ideas.

For the purpose of assessing improvisation, its helpful to be much more narrow with goals, and clarify the specific pedagogical outcome we want to observe.

Long-Range Planning and Improvisation Assessment:

Our long-range plans frame the activities we do in the music room. When we plan this way, we’re not planning from activity to activity. Instead, we’re choosing strategic learning experiences that build off of each other so students build knowledge through active musicking. Each activity we choose serves the larger learning goal, as we’ve articulated in our long-range plans.

Depending on our long-range plans, we might have specific goals that are based around another musical concept (for example - rhythm, pitch, or form), or another mode of musical expression (for example - improvising on barred instruments or recorder).

Sample Improvisation Goals:

Here are some sample goals we might articulate when it’s time to improvise. Notice each of these goals is an outcome we can hear and see.

  • Improvise 8 beats

  • Improvise with fluency

  • Improvise in question and answer form

  • Improvise within a specific toneset or rhythmic set

  • Improvise with speech

  • Improvise in a head voice

  • Improvise with a clear recorder tone

Clarity Through What We Don’t Assess

When we clarify our long-range goals, we know what we care about assessing. Equally important, we know what we’re not assessing.

For example, if our primary objective is for students to improvise for eight beats, that is the only thing we’re assessing. In that improvisation, we’re not concerned with the tone they produce on the instrument, how expressive the melodic line is, or whether or not they used question and answer form. There may be things we notice about their improvisation regarding the tone, expressivity, or form. However, because it’s not the purpose of the assessment, it’s not something we’ll document.

Assessing Improvisation in Elementary General Music

Today we’ve looked at several examples of assessing improvisation in elementary general music.

There are many more possibilities to framing assessment in elementary general music, but the principles will stay the same, regardless of the form the assessment takes.

  1. We’ll start with what exactly improvisation and assessment are.

  2. We’ll determine the type of data we’ll use to assess improvisation.

  3. Last, we’ll ground the assessment in long-range planning.